Questions d'entretien chez Perk

Interview process was extremely long and, at times, unnecessarily drawn out. I can now see why there are already a number of similar negative experiences shared here, and unfortunately, I have to add mine to that list. I met some genuinely great people along the way, particularly within the engineering leadership team. The system design round stood out as well structured, practical, and reflective of real-world expectations for the role. However, the roleplay stage was a significant weak point. I was given four scenarios, and apparently underperformed in one, which ultimately led to a rejection. The issue is that the scenario itself felt abstract and not well defined, making it difficult to engage in a grounded, realistic way. More concerning was that the evaluation appeared to rely heavily on a single interviewer’s judgment, with no clear evidence of calibration across multiple perspectives. It felt somewhat pre-judged and narrowly assessed. It came across as the interviewer selecting for candidates who match her personal leadership style, which can become a risk for the business over time by limiting diversity of thought and leadership approaches.